Activists challenge KRA on burden of tax proof
Crime and Justice
By
Kamau Muthoni
| Jan 07, 2026
Four activists led by Nakuru-based surgeon Magare Gikenyi have filed a court case challenging how the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) pursues tax defaulters.
In what they describe as a strategy built on falsehoods, Dr Magare, Philemon Abuga, Dishon Keroti, and Stanley Mageto argued in their High Court case that KRA should prove the amount a defaulter owes, rather than placing the burden on the taxpayer.
They took issue with Section 56 (1) of the Tax Procedures Act, 2015, which requires a taxpayer to prove a tax decision is incorrect.
In the case before High Court Judge Bahati Mwamuye, the four argued that the law gives KRA a blank cheque to exaggerate figures owed.
“Article 50 of the constitution requires that everyone is presumed to be innocent until proven otherwise. That it’s irrational and unconstitutional for the taxing body (KRA) to assume that the tax assessment made before objection is correct and that it’s the work of the tax-payer to show otherwise. Instead, the burden of proving that the assessment made is correct or not correct (ratio decidendi) ought to be at the door of the taxing body (KRA),” court papers read in part.
READ MORE
Kakamega youth, women eye avocado export cash after skills training
Portable kitchen: Designer taps into space-saving trend
Kenya urged to pilot AI regulatory Sandbox in bid to lead Africa's digital future
MPs pledge site visist as KTDA gives progress on hydro power project
Why Gen Zs are not sending money to parents
The true impact of Iran-US war on the Kenyan economy
KPA steps up plans for expansion of Kisumu Port
Infrastructure, trust key to cities success as Nairobi, Rome stagnate
HF Group posts 40pc jump in full-year net profit to Sh1.4 billion
How personalised developments are reshaping local property market
Magare argued that allowing KRA to demand any amount, including an incorrect figure, has opened doors for blackmail and bribery.
He said that anyone targeted by the government can be a victim as KRA will only need to dangle a figure to bait the person.
At the same time, he said that sometimes when one is sent the astronomical figures, he or she will look for avenues to clear the same through kick backs. The surgeon also told the court that the law also presumes a defaulter is guilty even before he or she is heard.
Justice Mwamuye directed that KRA, the Attorney General and Parliament be served with the court papers. The case will be heard on February 10, 2026. [Kamau Muthoni]