When demeaning demands turn politics into a humiliation theatre

There comes a time when we must draw the line. Recently, a leading politician stood before a crowd and demanded that women flaunt their bodies.

Astonishingly, the women complied. By equating “two terms” with “rounds,” the discourse twisted political ambition into a public display of sexual prowess. This was not humour. This was a public scandal that laid bare the sexualization of Kenya’s politics — and the moral rot it signifies.

How did a man find the audacity to make such a demand? Why did women respond as if it were normal or expected?

Politics can be messy, even desperate. But to cross the line into the indignification of women — reducing them to objects for male amusement — is not desperation. It is degradation. It is a betrayal of human dignity and of the values that any responsible political system should uphold.

Women in politics have fought for recognition not by pleasing men with erotic gestures, but by transcending gender limitations. Their influence grows not because they entertain, but because they lead. Yet, in a shocking display, respectable women went along with the demeaning demands.

Fear of losing political favour? Dependence on male sponsors? Identity relapse? The result is the same: an affirmation of diminishment. This is demoralising to those men and women who genuinely labour to uplift women from the corners of disrespect and minimisation.

Sexualized politics sends a clear and chilling message: women exist to serve men. Public space is turned into a stage for erotic display. Some men take perverse satisfaction in seeing women “put in their place.” This is not strategy—it is oppression.

Queen Vashti of the Bible refused to parade herself for male approval. Her courage and moral clarity have been celebrated for centuries. Why would some top women leaders comply with the diminution of their bodies and dignity in political rallies? To comply is to normalise degradation; it is to tell a watching generation that the female body is negotiable currency in the pursuit of political favor.

Even language has been weaponised to normalize sexualized politics. Erotic metaphors and symbolic sexual references are treated as acceptable discourse.

In a Gen Z era, where young people observe and internalize political behavior, this becomes a dangerous template: leadership is measured not by vision or competence, but by the ability to entertain sexual spectacle. Political parents are teaching a generation that vulgarity is a legitimate political tool.

Language is more than words; it shapes perception, action, and reality. When political discourse normalises erotic symbolism, boundaries of decency collapse.

Sensualisation in politics turns the public stage into a theatre of vice. Integrity is impossible where compliance is measured in erotic performance. Politics has no-go zones and sexualized display breaches them.

It is ethical clarity that measures leadership — not erotic performance.  Sexualized politics devalues women, diminishes their political capital, and signals that moral courage and dignity are optional for public participation.

Some argue that sexualized language is harmless or “part of the show.” It is not. It is a direct assault on the moral imagination of society. It tells girls that their worth is tied to performance of their bodies rather than intellect or leadership. It tells young men that leadership is not about discipline, vision, or character, but about the capacity to manipulate bodies and exploit sexual imagery. This is the erosion of moral authority, dressed up as entertainment.

Kenya has made strides in opening doors to women. But those gains are meaningless if public life condones sexualized spectacle. Respectable women who comply, intentionally or under duress, are reinforcing the very barriers many fought to dismantle. Men who have worked to elevate women’s status are demoralised, and the broader society is taught that the erosion of dignity is part of the political bargain.

Politicians must understand that there are lines that must never be crossed. The sexualization of politics is not a shortcut to popularity; it is a betrayal of public trust. Politics is not a theatre of seduction; it is a forum for governance, policy, and vision. When the line between entertainment and erotic exploitation is erased, leadership becomes a spectacle rather than a responsibility. And when sexualized spectacle becomes mainstream, we must ask: what moral and ethical precedent are we setting for our children? For our citizens? For a generation watching and learning what leadership looks like?

Morally and theologically, the consequences could not be clearer. To normalise erotic display in public life is to mock the sacred categories of purity, respect, and fidelity. It promotes a culture in which sexual boundaries are trivialized, and where sexualized power is mistaken for political skill. Some may argue that such codes are outdated. Yet even secular ethics recognize the harm in exploiting others for sexual amusement.

Women must reclaim their moral and political courage and refuse to be complicit in their own diminishment. Men in public life must reject the normalization of sexualized compliance. Leadership must respect the humanity of all participants. Sensualization of politics erodes the moral imagination necessary for a sobber society.

Ultimately, Kenya’s daughters deserve a political arena that recognizes their competence, not their capacity to entertain. Vashti would not have danced. She would not have complied.

Neither should we condone such acts today. Politics must remain a space of ideas, integrity, and humanity — not a stage for erotic compliance. Anything less is a betrayal of Kenya’s women.

If we allow the sexualization of politics to become the norm, we betray not only women, but the future of leadership itself. The moral line must be drawn. For the sake of women, for the sake of moral order, and for the sake of Kenya’s political integrity, the playground of degradation must end.

It is time to draw lines clearly and boldly. Sexualized displays, erotic language, and public demands for diminishment have no place in leadership. The stage is for vision, not seduction. For courage, not compliance. For integrity, not exploitation. Anything less is a lesson in degradation for a nation striving for dignity and respect. Kenya’s political leaders must remember: human dignity is non-negotiable, morality is not optional, and integrity cannot coexist with public erotic spectacle.

If we allow the sexualization of politics to become the norm, we betray not only women, but the future of leadership itself. The moral line must be drawn. For the sake of women, for the sake of moral order, and for the sake of Kenya’s political integrity, the playground of degradation must end.